SurveyMonkey - Survey Results

View Summary

Browse Responses

Filter Responses

Download Responses

Share Responses

current report:

Add Report

Response Summary

Total Started Survey:	33
Total Completed Survey:	28 (84.8%)

Show this Page Only

Page: Enter your name and that of your organization (optional)

1. Name
		Response Count
		28
	answered question	28
	skipped question	5

2. Organization
		Response Count
		28
	answered question	28
	skipped question	5

Show this Page Only

Page: Indicate each of the years when you had an entry in the TAC-SCM tournament

3. Years
		Response Percent	Response Count
2003		40.6%	13
2004		53.1%	17
2005		68.8%	22
2006		68.8%	22
2007		68.8%	22
No entry so far		15.6%	5
	answered question		32
	skipped question		1

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM entries

4. Reasons
		Response Percent	Response Count
I have no interest in this game anymore		0.0%	0
Did not have time		50.0%	2
Did not have the necessary manpower		50.0%	2
Entry fee is too high		0.0%	0
	answered question		4
	skipped question		29

5. Other (please specify)
		Response Count
		2
	answered question	2
	skipped question	31

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM participation

6. Assuming that the 2008 competition takes place in July-August, which of the following TAC-SCM events do you plan to enter:
		Response Percent	Response Count
TAC-SCM baseline game		100.0%	26
Procurement Challenge		26.9%	7
Prediction Challenge		34.6%	9
	answered question		26
	skipped question		7

7. Would you be more inclined to participate if the 2008 TAC-SCM event was collocated with a major conference (e.g. AAAI2008) rather than held as a virtual event:
		Response Percent	Response Count
Prefer collocation with major conference (with optional attendance)		53.6%	15
Prefer a virtual event		10.7%	3
Does not matter		35.7%	10
	answered question		28
	skipped question		5

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM events - TAC-SCM Baseline Game

8. TAC-SCM Baseline Game
	Would significantly DECREASE the chance I participate	Would somewhat DECREASE the chance I participate	NEUTRAL	Would somewhat INCREASE the chance I participate	Would significantly INCREASE the chance I participate	Response Count
Simplified version of the game	29.6% (8)	25.9% (7)	40.7% (11)	3.7% (1)	0.0% (0)	27
Significantly altered version of the game (e.g. introduction of new constraints such as negotiation of transportation assets and/or metrics that capture the environmental impact of different supply chain trading practices)	17.9% (5)	10.7% (3)	14.3% (4)	50.0% (14)	7.1% (2)	28
Keep everything the same	0.0% (0)	7.1% (2)	53.6% (15)	21.4% (6)	17.9% (5)	28
Other (please use the text box below to explain)	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	33.3% (2)	16.7% (1)	50.0% (3)	6
	answered question					28
	skipped question					5

9. TAC-SCM Baseline Game - Other (please specify)
		Response Count
		4
	answered question	4
	skipped question	29

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM events - Procurement Challenge

10. Procurement Challenge
	Would significantly DECREASE the chance I participate	Would somewhat DECREASE the chance I participate	NEUTRAL	Would somewhat INCREASE the chance I participate	Would significantly INCREASE the chance I participate	Response Count
Simplified version of the game	21.1% (4)	26.3% (5)	47.4% (9)	5.3% (1)	0.0% (0)	19
Enhanced version of the game	0.0% (0)	4.8% (1)	42.9% (9)	47.6% (10)	4.8% (1)	21
Introduction of multiple categories to allow for multiple winners	0.0% (0)	11.1% (2)	55.6% (10)	27.8% (5)	5.6% (1)	18
Keep everything the same	0.0% (0)	22.7% (5)	68.2% (15)	9.1% (2)	0.0% (0)	22
Other – please explain	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	87.5% (7)	0.0% (0)	12.5% (1)	8
	answered question					24
	skipped question					9

11. Prediction Challenge - Other (please specify)
		Response Count
		4
	answered question	4
	skipped question	29

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM events - Prediction Challenge

12. Prediction Challenge
	Would significantly DECREASE the chance I participate	Would somewhat DECREASE the chance I participate	NEUTRAL	Would somewhat INCREASE the chance I participate	Would significantly INCREASE the chance I participate	Response Count
Inclusion of new prediction metrics	0.0% (0)	5.0% (1)	60.0% (12)	30.0% (6)	5.0% (1)	20
Multiple categories to allow for multiple winners	0.0% (0)	5.0% (1)	65.0% (13)	25.0% (5)	5.0% (1)	20
Keep everything the same	0.0% (0)	9.1% (2)	77.3% (17)	13.6% (3)	0.0% (0)	22
Other – please explain	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	87.5% (7)	12.5% (1)	0.0% (0)	8
	answered question					23
	skipped question					10

13. Prediction Challenge - Other (please specify)
		Response Count
		2
	answered question	2
	skipped question	31

Show this Page Only

Page: TAC-SCM events - Other TAC-SCM event

14. Other TAC-SCM event
	Would significantly DECREASE the chance I participate	Would somewhat DECREASE the chance I participate	NEUTRAL	Would somewhat INCREASE the chance I participate	Would significantly INCREASE the chance I participate	Response Count
Introduction of an interactive version of the game (e.g. managers compete against trading agents or interactive agents assist managers)	0.0% (0)	3.8% (1)	38.5% (10)	30.8% (8)	26.9% (7)	26
Other – please explain	0.0% (0)	0.0% (0)	83.3% (5)	0.0% (0)	16.7% (1)	6
	answered question					26
	skipped question					7

15. Other TAC-SCM event - Other (please specify)
		Response Count
		2
	answered question	2
	skipped question	31

Show this Page Only

Page: Agent repository

16. Do you find the TAC Agent repository useful?
		Response Percent	Response Count
Yes		100.0%	28
No		0.0%	0
	answered question		28
	skipped question		5

Show this Page Only

Page: Research/educational value of TAC-SCM

17. Do you have any suggestions for improving the research/educational value of the competition?
		Response Count
		6
	answered question	6
	skipped question	27

Show this Page Only

Page: Additional comments

18. Enter here any other comments you may have about TAC-SCM and how you would like the tournament to evolve over the years to come
		Response Count
		5
	answered question	5
	skipped question	28